The B.C. education ministry put on a forum on the future of education recently, bringing together public and private school leaders with experts from around the world.
I watched the proceedings via webcast from the Wosk Centre for Dialogue in Vancouver, which gives you a hint about the forces pressing in on our century-old industrial model of schooling.
First up was Andreas Schleicher, via video link from his office in Paris, where he is director of education and skills for the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
He began with the international problem of people coming out of university who can’t find jobs, amid a skills shortage.
Schleicher said this is happening today because “it’s not what you know but what you can do with what you know.”
Some education systems are adapting better than others as the value of merely passing on facts has declined.
These days, he said, almost any student can pass any multiple-choice test if they have a smartphone. The question for parents is what to do “if you want your child to be smarter than a smartphone.”
The OECD runs international testing that consistently ranks B.C. and Canada among the best schools in the world and Schleicher described how that testing has evolved to keep up.
But, our progress in the past 10 years has tended to be slower than some Asian countries, despite B.C. being on the “high end of investment” in education.
He warned against the trap of the industrial school model, “pouring money in” to “do more of the same.”
Some of the best results emerging from a decade of digitally-driven globalization have been achieved through innovations that were financed through bigger class sizes, Schleicher said.
This was too much for one B.C. Teachers’ Federation representative in the audience, who introduced herself as someone who spent the last transformational decade working for the union, not in a classroom.
She disputed the OECD’s financial calculations, lecturing some of the world’s top economists that, based on “spending power,” B.C. schools are cash starved. She followed this with the laundry list of BCTF demands that hasn’t changed in 40 years — smaller classes, more prep time, more money.
The keynote speaker was Yong Zhao, University of Oregon professor of educational measurement, who gave a highly entertaining critique of standardized testing and creativity-crushing drills of the basics. (You can find a video archive at bcedplan.ca.)
Yong sparked a lively discussion about the need for foundation skills, which he and others agreed remain vital to success.
The issue seems to be how to instill those basics while avoiding the disengagement of students who see school as irrelevant to their lives.
Education Minister Peter Fassbender announced at the forum the province is about to unveil new curriculum that moves toward individual learning for all students. He said there will be a series of experiments conducted at yet-to-be-identified B.C. schools to pioneer new models of learning.
BCTF president Jim Iker sat stoically through the proceedings, where speakers described integrating community groups and businesses directly with schools.
That’s underway here, with trades training in particular.
Iker’s record on adaptation is clear from his own career. The only school where he actually taught was in the northwest B.C. village of Topley — and it closed in 2010 due to a long-term decline in rural students.
By 2001, Iker had left the classroom to work for the Burns Lake teachers’ union local, which the BCTF continues to staff eight years after that school district and others disappeared through amalgamation.
The post FLETCHER: Teachers, not union, adapting appeared first on Kamloops This Week.